The Boardroom Review and Dissent

A boardroom review is a procedure that allows a table to evaluate boardroombook.com/what-is-a-do-questionnaire/ its performance in a thorough manner. It helps table members identify the elements of longevity as well as weaknesses in their connections, leadership and their culture that could lead to both social and practical changes. It is also a way to ensure that those who pay for membership at the table are well-equipped to perform their duties.

This research area is in the process of development however there are a number challenges. The current empirical evidence shows inconsistent results regarding how dissent can affect boards and their function. While some studies highlight positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear effects, others find negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019) as well as mixed or non-significant results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats 2015; Minichilli et al. There is a 2012 study that shows) connections between dissent and the task performance of the board.

The literature is not able to provide more insight into the factors that influence the dissension's dynamics. To improve the understanding of this governance phenomenon, it is worthwhile for future research to develop a more theoretically integrated approach. This could involve the use of configuring approaches (Federo and Saz-Carranza 2018; Schiell Lewellyn, and Yan 2023) to assist researchers to better understand how board attributes processes, contexts, and even processes are connected to the necessary and sufficient causality in governance phenomena.

Additionally, some studies use an esoteric definition of dissent and do not present precise measurement methods. Therefore, these studies are susceptible to measurement errors. Therefore, it is important to come up with more reliable and precise dissent measurement methods.